This comment on a discussion board over at Motley Fool talks about the folly of our current approach to education.
I mean, really, what is the point of forcing all children down the same academically inclined educational path when a large propotion don't have the interest, aptitude or simply intelligence to gain anything from it?
What would be wrong with taking the non-academic types out of the system at a much earlier age and appealing to what DOES interest them?
Vocational courses have always been a poor relation to the academic and we're doing a great many people a disservice with this attitude.
Take the obnoxious little chavs and give them something to do that makes them more useful to society that simply keeping the gut-rot cider companies in business.
Even beyond the disruptive scumbag types, what about those who just don't want full-blown academia? The artists, musicians, linguists, sports(wo)men, carpenters, builders, etc? If a real vocation and propensity is shown at a fairly early age then take it and nurture it.
In the UK we're constantly talking about getting more and more people into higher education. Besides the fact that it's not the life for everybody, what exactly are we going to do with them all? I still want my car fixed, my drains cleared, my house wired and my bins emptied. This does not make anybody doing any of these jobs "below" someone with a degree. Personally, I think the guy emptying the bins is worth more to society than your average investment banker or computer programmer (and I work in IT).
We're a big hive of interdependent worker bees and we need to start accepting that everyone has a role to play irrelevant of educational background. And start giving everyone the chance to do what they are good at without cutting them off at the knees before they've even reached 16.
